Sign upAI-assisted editorial writing
The AI writers propose. Nothing moves forward without your decision. Choose your writers from a team of seven, each with its own angle — including one who argues the opposite of your position. Or create your own.
Open beta. No commitment, no charge.
One topic, handed to three AI writers. Excerpts from a demonstration article written in French by Pluvori, presented here in translation.
The topic: Replying to messages within the hour has become the norm. Should we go along with it?
The real cost of this norm never shows up in productivity charts. It lies elsewhere. It lies in that background vigilance that never switches off, that corner of the brain still tuned to the inbox even at the dinner table, even in the evening, even at weekends. We call it availability. In reality, it is a gradual erosion of the ability to rest, and therefore to think clearly.
Contrary to the initial fear, no one seemed offended for long. A little surprise at first, perhaps a raised eyebrow, a light remark about this new habit. But very soon, the information sank in. People adjusted their expectations. Those who really needed an urgent reply found other ways to say so, a phone call, an explicit mention of urgency. The rest, the vast majority of messages, simply waited.
The position I read in your text is this: it is legitimate, even desirable, to reject the norm of immediate replies and to switch off work requests after a certain hour. I will therefore argue that replying quickly to messages, including outside strict working hours, remains a mark of professionalism and respect that it would be risky to give up.
Replying quickly: a standard we shouldn’t be too quick to discard
Vael infers your position and argues the opposite, in good faith, saying so in the standfirst. What you do with it is up to you.
You set the topic. Its theme, what connects you to it, a rough length. On your own, or in an editorial meeting with Maïa, deputy editor.
The writers write. Up to three of them, in parallel, each producing a complete article. You read, edit, ask for an adjustment, rerun. Then you keep the versions that serve you.
You close the piece. Depending on the path you chose, the versions you kept are compared and then merged, or you keep just one. Solène, copy editor, revises without touching the substance. You approve each step, then mark the article as done.
Your text leaves by copy and paste. Pluvori never publishes anything for you.
It doesn’t decide the substance. Every step waits for you to act.
It publishes nothing and connects to none of your platforms.
It adds nothing to your text. A note disclosing the use of AI is offered to you separately, with its own “Copy” button. You’re free to use it, adapt it or ignore it.
No cookies, no analytics tools, in the app or on this site.
Opinion pieces, stories, analyses: for your work or for yourself. On your own or with others: a Space is shared among its members, who work on the same folders.
Pluvori is in beta. Signing up involves no commitment and no charge. Your feedback helps us find out whether it works as it should.